While audio quality in both sample isn’t HD, with the Krisp enabled example you don’t strain to pick out my voice (as all the background has been eliminated). Standard 8k sample (no enhancements) Krisp ENABLED 8k sampleĪt the lower sampling rates AND with background noise, Krisp shines here as you can hear, there is nearly no background noise. Below are two additional samples at only 8kz sampling rate, a more likely an Internet communications app. The Krisp app did not add any noticeable uptick in CPU utilization. Nonetheless, it’s an improvement over the standard (opinion). The artifacts give my voice a more mechanical sound and somewhat less natural. Negatively, Krisp has slightly altered my voice and introduced some new artifacts. The background noise is mostly gone in the Krisp enabled example. However, the background noise is similarly HD and competes with my voice.īelow is a 44100 Hz sample with Krisp ENABLED. In the baseline sample, my voice is clear and high quality. Here is a brief unmodified recording I did (using Audacity) on a MacBook Pro using the internal microphone at 44100Hz (high quality).įrom a previous posting on microphones, the Mac has a great internal mic. My tests are not scientific test but real enough to form an opinion of the Krisp app. I set about to ‘test’ Krisp in my open office environment with heaps of noisy co-workers (sadly typical for many SF tech offices these days). After 14 days though the application will only work for the ‘speaker’ (inbound audio) and NOT the microphone element. KRISP SOUND FULLKrisp offers a free full trial of the application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |